- Massachusetts AFL-CIO
- Massachusetts Labor
- Education & Training
- Organize or Die!
- Political Education
- About Political Education
- Election Year 2008
- Barack Obama - The Candidate to Turn Around America
- McCain: McSame as Bush - Bad for Working Families
- The Mass. AFL-CIO and the Mass. Democratic Party
- Past Election Endorsements
- Register To Vote!
- Find Elected Officials
- Online Legislative/Government Directory
- The Real Romney Record
- Multimedia
- Links and Resources
- Legislative Action
- Legislative Department
- Labor Voting Records
- Mass. House and Senate Web Broadcasts
- Online Legislative/Government Directory
- State House of Representatives Committee List 2007 - 2008
- State Senate Committee List 2007-2008
- 2007-2008 Legislative Agenda
- 2007-2008 Testimonies
- 2005-2006 Legislative Agenda
- Define Member Contribution
- Edward Cohen Plaque
- Indexing the Minimum Wage
- Majority Authorization
- New Families Trust Fund
- Outsourcing
- Plant Relocation
- Proper Expenditure of and Accounting for State Funds
- Protecting Employees
- Regulating Outsourcing
- To Ensure Quality Appointments
- Worker's Compensation
- Workforce Solutions Act
- Labor in the Community
Bust the Union Busters
Union Busting: The multi-million dollar industry that takes away your rights Over 60 million workers would join a union today if given the chance. However, despite their overwhelming will, most of those workers will not get the chance to vote for a union, even fewer will be successful in forming a union, and fewer still will be successful in earning a first contract. The propensity for workers to improve their workplace through organizing for better wages and benefits has created a shadow industry that charitably calls itself "union avoidance," but is more accurately referred to as union busting. Companies whose workers are organizing to gain union representation will pay tens of thousands, and sometimes millions of dollars to law or consulting firms in order to defeat organizing drives, rather than allocating that money towards quality wages and benefits for their employees. The disdain for unionization is so strong that oftentimes employers will spend more money on "union avoidance" than the employees are asking for in their contract demands. While employers have always resisted efforts to organize, union-busting firms did not become prominent until the 1970's. There are now thousands of these firms across the country, and their rise has a direct correlation with the decline in union density from 29% of U.S. workers in 1964 to 13% today. During an organizing campaign, 82% of employers will hire a union busting firm, and their strategies are generally similar. Consultants encourage employers to unfairly exert their power by holding captive audience meetings, forcing employees into one-on-one meetings with supervisors, and systematically undermining the law by firing or suspending union supporters. The ability for consultants and employers to break the law without repercussions, and to use fear and coercion to discourage employees from voting for a union is a major reason why we desperately need to pass the Employee Free Choice Act. Please see below for resources on the union busting industry. The best way to fight the influence of union-busting firms in an organizing campaign is to understand how they operate, and inoculate employees about the lies and propaganda that will likely be spread about the union.
Read a post on the "union avoidance" industry from the AFL-CIO blog. Read Unionbusting Confidential, an article by a labor-friendly reporter who infiltrated a union avoidance seminar held by the notorious union busting law firm Jackson-Lewis. American Rights at Work tracks and exposes the work of anti-union forces in the United States through it's Anti-Union Network. Find other resources on the union avoidance industry at www.nobusters.org.
»
|
Confessions of a Union Buster
Watch former union buster Martin Levitt come clean about the coercive tactics used to thwart union organizing campaigns.
|
