- Massachusetts AFL-CIO
- Massachusetts Labor
- Education & Training
- Organize or Die!
- Political Education
- About Political Education
- Election Year 2010
- The Mass. AFL-CIO and the Mass. Democratic Party
- Past Election Endorsements
- 2009/2010 US Senate Special Election to Replace the Late Edward Kennedy
- Election Year 2008
- Victory 2008: A Closer Look
- Victory Is Just The Beginning
- 2008 Endorsements
- Obama and Biden - The Ticket to Turn Around America
- McCain: McSame as Bush - Bad for Working Families
- Labor 2008: Massachusetts/New Hampshire 2008 Coordinated Campaign
- Vote NO on Question 1 - the campaign to defeat the ballot initiative to eliminate the income tax
- State Legislative Races
- March 2008 Special Election Endorsements
- 2007: Special Elections
- 2006: The Fight for Working Families
- The Employee Free Choice Act
- Register To Vote!
- Find Elected Officials
- Online Legislative/Government Directory
- The Real Romney Record
- Multimedia
- Links and Resources
- Legislative Action
- Legislative Department
- Labor Voting Records
- Legislative Agenda
- 2009-2010 Legislative Agenda
- Destination Resort Casinos
- Modernizing and Protecting Unemployment Insurance
- Paid Sick Days
- Plant Relocation
- Privatizing Contracts
- Protecting Against the Displacement of Current Employees
- Safer Alternatives to Toxic Chemicals
- Safety and Protection at Utility and Construction Sites
- Temporary Workers' Right to Know
- Workers' Compensation - Private Right of Action
- 2007-2008 Legislative Agenda
- 2005-2006 Legislative Agenda
- Define Member Contribution
- Edward Cohen Plaque
- Indexing the Minimum Wage
- Majority Authorization
- New Families Trust Fund
- Outsourcing
- Plant Relocation
- Proper Expenditure of and Accounting for State Funds
- Protecting Employees
- Regulating Outsourcing
- To Ensure Quality Appointments
- Worker's Compensation
- Workforce Solutions Act
- 2009-2010 Legislative Agenda
- Legislative Issues
- Testimony
- The Employee Free Choice Act
- Mass. House and Senate Web Broadcasts
- Online Legislative/Government Directory
- House Committees
- Senate Committees
- Massachusetts Boards and Commissions
- Labor in the Community
Major Academic Study Finds No Union Intimidation from Majority Sign Up
Major Academic Study Finds No Union Intimidation from Majority Sign Up
Study analyzed public sector in four states over six year period
(Washington, May 27) Majority signup does not cause union or employer intimidation, according to a new report released by departments at University of Illinois, Rutgers University, Cornell University, and University of Oregon. Participants analyzed data from public sector workers in New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and Oregon for six years and found that out of more than 34,000 people who joined unions through majority sign up, a process sometimes referred to as “card check,” there was not “a hint” of union or employer intimidation.
The report states:
In brief, from 2003-2009, a total of 34,148 public sector workers employed in state, county, municipal and educational institutions voluntarily joined a union. Most importantly, contrary to business claims, in 1,073 cases of union certification and in at least 1,359 majority-authorization campaigns, there was not a single confirmed incidence of union misconduct.
The report comes as Congress considers the Employee Free Choice Act, legislation that will give workers back the freedom to bargain with corporations for better wages and benefits. It includes a majority sign up provision which gives workers the choice of how to form a union rather than leaving that choice in employers’ hands, as it is under current law. Opponents claim this will lead to intimidation and coercion from unions, but according to today’s report, that simply isn’t true.
“Today’s report proves, once again, that corporations are leveling baseless allegations in a desperate attempt to prevent workers who want a union from forming one,” said AFL-CIO President John Sweeney. “Unions are the single best ticket in our nation to the middle class for working men and women. The Employee Free Choice Act returns to workers the freedom to form and join a union to improve their lives.”
According to the findings, the lack of intimidation on either side also shows that when there is a clear path to forming a union, the workplace as a whole functions more smoothly with no friction.
The report concludes:
As is true in so many other policy areas, on the subject of union representation the states are incubators for new ideas and practices. New York, New Jersey, Illinois and Oregon have demonstrated that a majority-authorization petition can genuinely determine the will of the employees to be unionized and provides a functional, largely non-adversarial and event-less process for insuring a fair work environment for everyone.
According to the report, the states’ laws are very similar to the proposed Employee Free Choice Act majority sign up provision. The report was commissioned by the United Association for Labor Education.
The report was authored by Robert Bruno, Associate Professor and Director of the Labor Education Program, University of Illinois School of Labor and Employment Relations; Adrienne E. Eaton, Professor, Department of Labor Studies and Employment Relations,
Rutgers University; Sally Alvarez, Director of Labor Programs, Extension Division
School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University; Lynn Feekin, Instructor,
University of Oregon Labor Education and Research Center.
To view the report, go to: http://www.aflcio.org/joinaunion/voiceatwork/efca/upload/multistate_efca051409.pdf
### »
|


