Massachusetts AFL-CIO Testimony Before Joint Standing Committee on Labor and Workforce Development

Bob Haynes, MA AFL-CIO Testimony ~ Wednesday February 13, 2008 ~ 10 AM ~ Room B-2

Hearing before Joint Standing Committee on:
LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

Chair David M. Torrisi of North Andover Chair Thomas McGee of Lynn
Vice Chair John W. Scibak of South Hadley Vice Chair Pam Resor of Acton
Paul C. Casey of Winchester Patricia Jehlen of Somerville
Colleen M. Garry of Dracut Edward Augustus of Worcester
Demetrius J. Atsalis of Barnstable Steven Tolman of Brighton
Barbara A. L’Italien of Andover
Sean Curran of Springfield
Martha M. Walz of Boston
Thomas J. Calter, III of Kingston

Remarks:

Thank you for the opportunity to testify here this morning Chairman Torrisi and Chairman McGee. For the record my name is Bob Haynes, President of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO. The Massachusetts AFL-CIO is the largest labor organization in the Commonwealth, representing upwards near 400,000 union families from over 700 local unions.

I am here today to testify on behalf of a number of pieces of legislation that are of importance to the working families of this Commonwealth. I am here today to talk about safety and fairness in the workplace. I am here to urge you to do the right thing for workers in Massachusetts, as well as for our economy and our government.

First, allow me to register the full support of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO for House Bill 1866/Senate Bill 1088, An Act to Provide a Safe Workplace for Employees of the Commonwealth and Its Political Sub-Divisions. Amazingly, public sector workers in Massachusetts have not been given our utmost protection in terms of workplace safety. Our public sector workers have been vulnerable because of a comprehensive lack of safety protections in the workplace. That must end now.

The over 100 work-related fatalities since 1990, and the thousands of injuries in that same time period are inexcusable and we have a chance to ensure that similar accidents, similar injuries and similar loss of life do not happen to workers and their families in the future. We have a chance today – excuse me, YOU have a chance today – to say to families of workers like Roger LeBlanc, a 39-year-old MassPort electrician who died on the job three and a half years ago in an entirely preventable accident, that Massachusetts is a state that is committed to providing for a basic level of safety procedures in our public workplaces. You can prove that this General Court values life and values the contributions of our public servants. You can prove that you value public service by instituting basic measures of safety precautions and protections for our public sector workers. It is a travesty that it has taken this long, but you can end the travesty by moving positively on this bill.

In addition to demonstrating your respect for the lives of public servants, you can also do a fiscally responsible thing for the Commonwealth with this bill. Those of us in labor are constantly defending the necessity and fairness of Workers’ Compensation. Workers who are injured on the job need the vital safety net that is Workers’ Compensation. However, the Commonwealth can spare itself of some of the more than $50 million in Workers’ Compensation costs for injuries and illnesses suffered by state workers because basic safety provisions do not currently exist. If you go down beyond the state level to the county and municipal level, that number soars to $200 million. At a time when we’re talking about rising costs of public service and declining public revenues, it seems to me that we want to do everything we can to limit costs like these. Since most of these injuries, illnesses and even deaths are preventable with the institution of the basic safety measures provided for in this bill you should do right by our workers and our budget by reporting this bill out favorably

Additionally, I am here to register the strong opposition of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO towards House Bill 1795, An Act Clarifying the Definition of an Employee. This legislature worked very hard in recent years to clarify the definition of an employee. You worked tirelessly and correctly to address the fraudulent practices of those who would 10-99 their employees, label those who were truly employees as “independent contractors”, and deny the state the requisite payroll, workers’ compensation, unemployment and other taxes rightfully due to us. You addressed the uneven playing field that 10-99 and independent contractor abuses had created in our economy. This bill seeks to undo all your good work and take what is now a much more even playing field and send it back to the days when employers abused the system to enhance their competitive advantage at the expense of the workers and the Commonwealth. I urge you to please protect our workers by giving them the protections they rightfully deserve by giving them the rights and benefits that come with being employees. Independent contractors are denied legal protections under basic labor laws. Do not endorse the notion that employers should be able to continue to abuse workers and rob the state of literally millions of dollars in various tax revenues by misusing the independent contractor concept. Do not endorse the notion that we should continue to reward those who cheat and abuse the system, and punish the good employers who play by the rules and do right by the workers and the Commonwealth. Reject House Bill 1795 out of hand immediately with a negative report and put to rest this ridiculous debate about who is an employee. We know what an employee is and this bill seeks to undermine that concept and hurts workers and the Commonwealth in the process.

Additionally, HB 1830 needs to be addressed. The hard working men and women of the Steamship Authority, members of the Marine Engineers’ Benefactors Association (MEBA), have been waiting for years to be given binding arbitration to settle their contracts. They have been forced to go far too long without contracts and are willing to subject themselves to a third party to try and get a resolution that is fair. I would say to you that it is categorically unfair and defeats the process of collective bargaining if the employer at the Steamship Authority can delay and delay and deny the workers a contract they deserve. Give these workers binding arbitration like you’ve done with other key public personnel, particularly around transportation.

Finally, the Massachusetts AFL-CIO would like to go on record in support of Senate Bill 1055, An Act Relative to Apprentice Training, as well as Senate Bill 1065, An Act Relative to Chapter 23 of the General Laws. We urge positive reports for both of these pieces of legislation because they strengthen the Commonwealth’s commitment to crucial apprenticeship programs that develop and train skilled workers in key crafts. These bills say that the Commonwealth is serious about education and training for our workforce and bolsters our support for the superior training provided by apprenticeship training programs run jointly by good employers and good labor unions. These bills say that employers must be serious about their apprenticeship programs. It rewards those who abide by the spirit and intent of the apprenticeship concept, as well as punishes those who abuse or mislead workers about the true seriousness of their apprenticeship programs.

Thank you.